No Raining on Obama’s parade

RAIN OR SHINE. A rally in Virginia goes on. The 26,000 in attendance didn't seem to mind. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)

It’s official. This US Election matters to me more than it should. But then again, that’s exactly it — these things should matter more to more people, but that’s a topic for a whole other time.

Last Friday’s debate between Obama and McCain went down the way people least expected it: it went down as you would expect. McCain was McCain, Obama was Obama. Both were railing at the other with their usual talking points. It really wasn’t a debate. Or if it was, it’s as big a debate as you could get between an apple and an orange, a Mac and a PC, a Marvel and a DC. They threw their punches but it didn’t really matter. The Democrats had their debate, the Republicans had their debate too. Of course, the post-campaign spin from both camps would claim victory, as is the case when it comes to a tie.

The only question is how much a tie it was. Were they both good? Were they both bad?

I agree that neither completely answered the question on what spending project they would give up on given the $700 billion bailout. But that is only because they can’t see that far into the future. They are policy makers and so I’ll have to give this point to Obama. (The media just didn’t get their soundbite really). In responding to what he’ll give up, he reiterated his priorities but expressed that he was non-commital: he had to see the language first, he had to know how much they would raise by time the budgetary process begins. Obama isn’t a mere politician, he is the thinking man’s technocrat and a leader that can remain cool, calculating and rational under pressure. Granted, the debate format isn’t friendly to someone who thinks too much, but then I just have to say that he’s come across more confident than ever.

McCain’s response to the economic question ended with him muttering “spending freeze”. It remains how far that will take him and how that will be spun. Nonetheless, I have to recognize that when it comes to foreign policy, McCain has some advantage — but not by much. It’s rather puerile to bring up that he couldn’t pronounce the name of the President of Iran — it’s Ahmadinejad — but there is no excuse to say the President of Pakistan’s name completely wrong — it’s Zardari, not Kardari. (Wrong spelling is wrong, right John?) And at times it’s impressive to rattle off Russian cities and capitals, but when it comes to calling Pakistan a failed state (this is a loaded technical term in political science, very much like “preconditions”)in 1999 then some judgment has to be called into question.

Nonetheless, debates are all about image and perception. McCain has long been acknowledged to be superior when it comes to foreign policy experience and this debate does not change that. What has changed however, is Obama emerging as a credible commander-in-chief. He has shown a steely cool judgement in foreign affairs. While I agree that he has to polish his stance on Iran a little bit more (he’s on the way) and that he could have hammered McCain on his “League of Democracies” idea further (shades of League of Nations, anyone?), he has shown that he can go toe-to-toe with McCain on his home turf.

Just one problem in this whole debate: Where was China in all this? The greatest “threat” to the United States is not militaristic but economic. Obama goes on often about protecting American jobs from being shipped overseas — so I still wonder what his China and India policy will be like. But if his whole perspective on foreign policy is consistent, then the America he leads will be one that welcomes the rise of Asia as an opportunity, not a threat. Yet as a policy, this remains to be seen.

The objective observer in me recognizes how this debate is a draw. Nonetheless, the partisans in all us know where we stand. What matters now are the independents. I am not surprised that a lot of them remain undecided; this debate may be a draw but that doesn’t mean that the two candidates are the same. Above anything else, this debate is a study in contrasts.

Obama and McCain are yin and yang. Of all their contrasts, the assessment I agree with most is that they represent an America at the crossroads of two generations. One is from the America that has always been there: strong, triumphant, and takes pride in longevity and experience. The other is from an America that is just being born: cosmopolitan, global, and takes pride in diversity and change. What makes this election so close is that these two paradigms present equally valid ways of dealing with the present economic crisis, the lingering wars on Iraq and Afghanistan, and the standing of America at home and abroad. Thus, this isn’t about partisanship anymore, it’s about leadership. Who has what it takes to live out the vision of America they present?

I am not an American so my opinion really won’t matter. Nonetheless, this debate has shown me the qualities I’ve been looking for — qualities I’ve seen long since. The beauty of a democracy is that the Americans can get to share what they see too; the tragedy of a democracy is that I don’t get to.


7 thoughts on “No Raining on Obama’s parade

  1. It must have been extremely difficult for a man of John McCain’s stature to engage in a so called debate with a man of Obama’s
    questionable character.
    McCain had to humble himself, something I have never seen Obama do.
    Obama calls everyone a liar who doesn’t agree with him.
    John McCain who comes from military royalty, who was a POW and has over 26 years of experience in Washington as a bipartisan senator is light years ahead of Obama in personal intelligence and experience.
    Senator John McCain is man of substance whereas Obama just knows how to ramble.
    I don’t go by the polls so I predict a McCain win in November.
    And I’m a democrat. But I registered republican this time to vote McCain. I don’t want a far left liberal as president.
    The liberal media reports what they want us to hear. But they are not even counting the millions who have registered Republican for the first time to make sure Obama loses. Obama is talk, but no history to back up his talk.
    This is what will bring his defeat.
    McCain knew more about the world and its problems than did Obama. Obama simply repeated what he heard and McCain spoke from his heart what he has seen and heard firsthand.

  2. I disagree with janelinda about how McCain humbled himself. The debate showed how condescending McCain was, always pointing out that “Senator Obama doesn’t understand” when in fact Obama was making solid arguments. He came off as an angry old man. While I agree with Sir that the debate was a draw; both had valid points but in terms of courtesy and body language, McCain lost. He also rambled way too much about his POW days. The debate wasn’t about personal anecdotes – it was supposed to be about the candidates’ policies. I cringed every time McCain went “Back in the day..”.

    The thing is, a lot of people (myself included, admittedly) expected McCain to pwn Obama; and he didn’t. He had way more experience and I think he could have done amazingly, but he didn’t. So in a way, Obama still won even if it was a draw.

  3. Well, rarr-kun, if you think Obama won; all it tells me is who you are. You said nothing that would pardon Obama.
    Of course McCain had to humble himself to engage Obama. One is a war hero from military royalty who has good senate voting record, the other a former pal of a terrorist with a shoddy senate record who believes in abortion and same sex “marriage”
    The stale worthless aim at McCain’s age still misses.
    Obama had no valid points, all he did was generalize.
    You cringed because it wasn’t you that endured five years of depression and suffering in a foreign land never knowing if you would live or die.
    Imagine if it had been you, you would have not endured it.
    Obama isn’t fit to tie McCain’s shoes.

  4. Hi Martin Perez, I see you live in the Philippines. My son met a girl there on one of his business trips, they married…. and they are still happily married.

  5. as a US citizen and have witnessed and personally experienced the economic crisis brought on by the Republicans, I have to look at the whole picture, I voted Obama so we can move on, I don’t think it will be a negative effect if we have the tri fecta, Dem for Pres. Dem ruling the Senate and Congress. sometimes it is hard for people who are over there to see the real picture of what is going on over here in the US.

  6. rarr.kun….Well of course anyone who is a kool-aid drinking devotee of Obama is going to disagree with me about McCain.
    We can go where God doesn’t want us to go and this is where Obama went…where god doesn’t want him.
    So…this means that God cannot bless Obama as president.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s